A feasibility report that confirms the National Statement both permits and encourages a flexible approach to consent, so that participant information sheets address variations in the needs or characteristics of potential trial participants.
Latest Resource
-
Normalising comparative effectiveness trials as clinical practice
-
ACTA Integrated Consent User Guide and Template
-
ACTA Discussion Paper: integrated consent – a tiered approach to consent for comparative effectiveness trials
-
ACTA Comparative Effectiveness Trials: Requirements for Low Risk Ethics Review
-
Applying a proportionate approach to consent in comparative effectiveness trials
-
International Best Practice Towards a Learning Healthcare System
-
How can clinical trials networks drive better translation of evidence into better quality care?
-
How can clinical trials networks drive better translation of evidence into better quality care?
-
The Clinician Researcher’s Perspective: Measuring impact on individual clinical practice
-
Health system sustainability and continuous self-improvement
-
The Health Service Provider’s Perspective: How should we measure impact on service delivery?